Breast lump remval by Vacuum-assisted excision: VAE Article by Assoc. Prof. Younush Kongdan Medical technology continues to advance, leading to more effective treatments and minimizing impacts on patients. Vacuum-Assisted Excision (VAE) is one of the key innovations in the treatment of benign breast tumors, particularly Fibroadenoma, offering advantages in reducing trauma compared to traditional surgery. This article will discuss the VAE technique, its benefits, limitations, and application at Namarak Hospital. Effectiveness and Safety A meta-analysis has demonstrated that VAE is highly effective in treating benign tumors, with a tumor removal success rate of 93% and a recurrence rate of only 3.9%. Complication rates are comparable to open surgery (3.4%-6.6%), with common issues including minor bleeding or hematoma (6%-9%) and mild pain or bruising (7%-8%). Severe complications are extremely rare, with one study reporting only two cases. VAE Surgical Procedure The VAE technique involves extracting tissue through a vacuum-assisted system, controlled via computer. The procedure uses a large needle (sizes 7-10) under local anesthesia, reducing blood loss and enhancing patient comfort. Steps in the Procedure:
Indications for VAE VAE is indicated for the following cases:
Ideal Candidates for VAE
Limitations The efficacy of VAE decreases with larger tumor sizes and depends on the physician’s experience. At Namarak Hospital, tumors measuring up to 3-4 cm have been successfully removed entirely. Advantages of VAE Compared to Open Surgery Treatment Benefits
Aesthetic and Satisfaction Benefits
Cost Benefits
Services at Namarak Hospital Namarak Hospital offers state-of-the-art VAE procedures for the treatment of Fibroadenoma. This minimally invasive technique reduces the risks associated with major surgery while providing effective results, ideal for patients seeking small scars, quick recovery, and enhanced aesthetic outcomes. Conclusion The VAE technique is a safe and effective alternative for treating benign breast tumors, particularly small Fibroadenomas. Its outcomes are comparable to open surgery but offer significant advantages, including reduced pain, smaller scars, and lower costs. However, selecting suitable patients is critical for achieving optimal results.
|
top of page
bottom of page
Comments